The Brief.

The business of content.

Tag: Monetisation

  • How to Read a Brand Deal Like a Lawyer

    How to Read a Brand Deal Like a Lawyer

    Brand partnerships have become a central revenue stream for independent creators. For many, they’re the first sign that a personal project has matured into a business. But the document that arrives attached to a friendly email is rarely as benign as it looks. A collaboration agreement is a legal contract with consequences that can shape your income, your image, and your future commercial opportunities.

    Lawyers approach contracts as instruments of power: one side tries to secure as much of it as possible, the other side attempts to hold on to what’s theirs. Creators often forget they’re part of that negotiation. They sign quickly, grateful for the opportunity, and in doing so, sometimes give away far more than they realise.

    Approach the contract with the same care the brand’s legal team already has.

    Usage Rights: the Most Expensive Sentence You’ll Overlook

    Among the most consequential clauses are those governing “usage,” “licensing,” or “content rights.” This section determines how, where, and for how long the brand can use the work you create.

    A one-off post can quietly become a year-long global advertising campaign. Your face, voice, or likeness might be used to sell a product on platforms you don’t control, with no further payment.

    Look for language such as “in perpetuity,” “royalty-free,” or “worldwide usage.” These are signals that the brand wants long-term control without additional compensation. Unless that’s reflected in the fee, those terms should be challenged or narrowed. Usage rights should always be specific — ideally tied to a platform, a territory, and a defined duration.

    Exclusivity: The Clause That Locks You Out

    Many contracts include exclusivity periods, restricting creators from working with competitors for a certain time. The risk isn’t theoretical. A single vague clause can prevent you from accepting better offers later, or block collaborations with brands you’ve spent months cultivating.

    Demand clarity. What counts as a “competitor”? How long does the restriction apply? Is it tied to one category, or does it cast a wider net? Ambiguity here benefits only the brand. Precise language protects your future revenue.

    Payment Terms: Numbers Are Not the Whole Story

    The fee written in the contract isn’t the amount that matters — the timeline is. A five-figure deal can become a financial strain when it’s paid on a 90-day schedule. Payment terms are a form of leverage, and late or drawn-out schedules often shift that leverage away from the creator.

    Push for clear, short payment timelines. Net 15 or net 30 is standard for many independent contractors. Where possible, request a partial payment upfront. The earlier the cash arrives, the less operational risk you carry.

    Deliverables and Approvals: Where Delays and Scope Creep Live

    Every contract should state, in exact terms, what you’re delivering and what the brand can request in return. Loose language here can turn a simple campaign into weeks of unpaid labour.

    A sound agreement includes:

    • The number and format of deliverables
    • Specific posting dates or deadlines
    • Defined rounds of feedback and revisions
    • Response times for approvals

    Without these parameters, creators often find themselves stuck in an approval cycle that burns through time and profit margins.

    Indemnity and Liability: Clauses That Few Read, But Should

    The most intimidating paragraphs are usually the most important. Indemnity clauses allocate legal risk — sometimes entirely to you. If a product fails, if a campaign is pulled, or if the brand faces a claim, these clauses can determine whether you’re financially exposed.

    A balanced contract protects both parties. If the indemnity is one-sided, push for language that limits your liability to your own actions, not the brand’s. This is where legal advice pays for itself.

    Everything Can Be Negotiated

    Many creators assume contracts are fixed. They are not. They are drafts — often written to secure maximum protection for the brand, not a fair balance. Even minor adjustments can have long-term financial impact. Changing “in perpetuity” to “12 months” or adding a clear exclusivity window can preserve future earnings.

    Brands expect questions. The ones who don’t are often the ones you shouldn’t work with.

    Read Slowly. Assume Nothing.

    A contract is an allocation of power, not a formality. If you don’t understand a clause, ask for clarity. If the language is vague, tighten it. If something looks lopsided, it probably is. Independent creators operate in a landscape where legal support is often absent by default, but silence at this stage can be expensive later.

    Reading a brand deal like a lawyer doesn’t require a law degree. It requires an appetite for detail, a refusal to rush, and an understanding that your work has value long after the campaign ends.

  • What Creators Can Learn from OnlyFans

    What Creators Can Learn from OnlyFans

    How a platform often dismissed for its adult content quietly perfected the direct-to-audience model.

    For years, tech companies have been trying to build the perfect creator platform. Subscription buttons, tipping systems, new algorithms, endless talk about “empowerment.” Meanwhile, one company quietly got it right — not through innovation theatre, but through a blunt, workable model.

    OnlyFans didn’t reinvent the internet. It removed the noise. It gave creators a way to build direct relationships, set their own price, and get paid without having to beg an algorithm for scraps. That’s the part most of the tech world still doesn’t want to admit.

    Visibility isn’t a lottery

    Most platforms keep creators on a leash. Reach depends on engagement spikes, algorithm shifts, and whether your content fits the current flavour of the week. OnlyFans works on a simpler premise: if someone pays to follow you, they see what you post. Every time.

    No games. No disappearing reach. No paid boosts. That kind of predictability is rare online, and it gives creators actual control over their audience.

    Small numbers can pay the bills

    The traditional internet economy fetishises reach. OnlyFans rewards loyalty. A creator with a few hundred subscribers can out-earn someone with a massive following elsewhere.

    Five hundred subscribers at $10 a month is $5,000 in predictable income — without chasing viral moments, brand deals, or platform bonuses. That’s a steady business, not a gamble on attention.

    Access is the hook

    The product isn’t just the content. It’s the closeness. Subscribers pay because they get direct contact — messages answered, attention returned. That kind of proximity is rare on the big ad-driven networks, and it’s what turns casual followers into paying supporters.

    It’s not romantic or sentimental; it’s structural. Intimacy, when managed well, scales better than reach.

    Niche beats noise

    Creators are often told to go broad — reach more people, post everywhere, get bigger. OnlyFans proves that narrow works. A well-defined niche with a loyal base can outperform a massive but passive audience.

    This is the part most “creator tools” miss: focus is an asset, not a limitation. The sharper the niche, the more direct the connection, the stronger the revenue.

    Power stays with the creator

    The platform doesn’t own the pricing. It doesn’t decide who sees what. It doesn’t shuffle creators through an opaque feed designed to keep them on a hamster wheel. OnlyFans hands over the controls and gets out of the way.

    For creators burned out by the churn of attention-based platforms, that control isn’t a perk — it’s the entire point.

    Lessons worth taking

    You don’t need to be on OnlyFans to borrow its playbook. The structure — not the content — is what works. Substack proved the model with newsletters; OnlyFans applied it to everything else.

    • Build a direct line to your audience.
    • Prioritise recurring revenue.
    • Keep control of pricing and delivery.
    • Focus on loyal niches, not big numbers.
    • Offer real access, not algorithmic crumbs.

    The rest of the industry is still over-engineering solutions to problems OnlyFans quietly solved years ago. Creators looking to build sustainable work don’t need another platform chasing buzzwords. They need a model that works. This one already does.